Technology

59402 readers

3076 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

938

submitted 9 months ago by Squire1039@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Key Points:

Apple opposed a right-to-repair bill in Oregon, despite previously supporting a weaker one in California.
The key difference is Oregon's restriction on "parts pairing," which locks repairs to Apple or authorized shops.
Apple argues this protects security and privacy, but critics say it creates a repair monopoly and e-waste.
Apple claims their system eases repair and maintain data security, while Google doesn't have such a requirement
Apple refused suggestions to revise the bill
Cybersecurity experts argue parts pairing is unnecessary for security and hinders sustainable repair.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If parts pairing is nessesary, then just publish the tool used for pairing?

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

-Apple's official statement.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's a security risk that would allow dangerous 3rd party hardware to be paired with perfect Apple products.

/s...if it's really necessary.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

Wouldn't that defeat the purpose?