this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
140 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
528 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Washington Post: Americans waste $10 billion each year on name-brand ink. So we tested low-cost options including remanufactured cartridges, ink injection kits — and even making our own.

My advice: get a mono laser printer. Printing is handy but relatively infrequent for a lot of people these days. If that's your use case, mono laser is the way to go. Toner does not dry out or go bad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmyatom@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Maybe I'm naive, but what's holding everyone back from living a paperless life or at least attempt to? Other than printing out the occasional return labels for Amazon stuff I return (they offer label free drop offs now), I can't think of anything else I would use it for as most things have gone digital.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Signatures, people not wanting to rely on phones, paper requires essentially only literacy while phones require more, more privacy with paper, honestly the list is pretty long.

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I get wanting to go paper free, but I like to have paper copies of important docs in my file cabinet.

Also i have an eight year old, so its fun to be able to print out papercrafts, patterns, exercises etc ... having a printer is a good thing to have for a kid.

[–] sylverstream@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago

We use it mainly to print coloring pages for our kids :)

[–] ydant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Kids in school was the primary reason for a printer, but the need has definitely decreased over the years. Our family is at about 5 prints per year at this point, which is exactly why a laser printer is so valuable. The same Brother printer ($150 in 2012) has worked for us for going on 11 years now with minimal expense on replacement toner. It just works when needed and never dries up or has issues.

But as much as you would like to be paperless, things come up. Some companies insist on wet signatures, other things need to be mailed in, etc. It's certainly becoming less and less necessary year by year, though.

I'm not sure if I would replace this printer if it fails, but it sure is nice to have around when I need it, without the hassle of going out to print something at a shop.

[–] strangerloop@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Student here, journal articles are a lot easier to read on paper than on screen. After the first hour or so of screen reading my eyes get drier than the Sahara and I feel dizzy. I tried reading on my e-reader, but journals like to cram as much text on a page as possible, which doesn't work well on a 6" reader.

[–] PRIMALmarauder@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's been a while since I've used an e-reader, but don't they let you change the font size? It's kind of like zooming in, but actually readjusts the words to fit the screen. Again, I might be making this up.

[–] strangerloop@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

No, you're right! But it's only possible for epub/mobi and txt files.

Pdfs can be zoomed into, but then you need to scroll around the page and it starts feeling rather like you're looking at the paper through a keyhole. I tried converting pdf to epub, but the formatting/page layout of the original matters and it doesn't translate well.