Not yet, but they’ve said it will be. Personally I’m excited to see “mainstream” social media using ActivityPub, but you’ll find that it’s quite a divisive issue.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Same. Glad to see not everyone wants rid of it

[–] desconectado@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was also on your boat, until I read this... Take into account this was published before Threads was official. https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

[–] infotainment@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I’ve said this elsewhere, but I don’t really agree with the article’s premise about what happened to XMPP.

XMPP was a niche thing before Google appeared, and it remained a niche thing after Google left. That said, it would have been much better had Google continued to support it!

[–] ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threads is federated afaik, yeah. It's just that many Fediverse instanced blocked Meta.

[–] EricHill78@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They haven't federated yet but they say they will eventually. I'm going to change instances to ones that don't want to join them if/when it happens.

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 5 points 1 year ago

Tumblr said that too but never did it actually. It's not so easy to join a network where the skills of any single "kid" could be compared to your 1000+ employees company.

[–] Jedi@bolha.forum 3 points 1 year ago

They said they still figuring out how to handle the federated posts into its content recommendation algorithm and moderation tools. So not yet.

(Sauce: https://www.timothychambers.net/2023/07/08/threads-and-activtypub.html )

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it can interact with mastodon yeah.
but afaik it's a one-way integration currently. (mastodon users can see threads users but not vise versa)

[–] MinusPi@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but hardly anyone is willing to federate with it.