this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
160 points (91.7% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons

11023 readers
5 users here now

A community for discussion of all things Dungeons and Dragons! This is the catch all community for anything relating to Dungeons and Dragons, though we encourage you to see out our Networked Communities listed below!

/c/DnD Network Communities

Other DnD and related Communities to follow*

DnD/RPG Podcasts

*Please Follow the rules of these individual communities, not all of them are strictly DnD related, but may be of interest to DnD Fans

Rules (Subject to Change)

Format: [Source Name] Article Title

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world
owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
160
Apparently all of the DND 5.5 physical sourcebook team was let go during Hasbro's December layoffs (www.youtube.com)
submitted 9 months ago by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/dnd@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darjr@chirp.enworld.org 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@btmoo @Alphastream I think this is entirely bogus. Yiu also follow this, any insight Teos?

[–] Alphastream@dice.camp 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@darjr @btmoo Absolutely bogus.

[–] Abstruse@chirp.enworld.org 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

@Alphastream @darjr @btmoo Got into a discussion about this on a Discord server.

It was the D&D fiction team, not the D&D rules/game book team.

And they were part of the layoffs from Hasbro, not fired.

Frankly, considering the guy says in the video they were laid off and not fired AND this guy's done this clickbait crap in the past, Hasbro/WotC should start sending C&Ds for defamation since they're knowingly lying.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 9 months ago

@Abstruse@chirp.enworld.org Do you have a named source / a good authority or anything that I can reference?

If this is true, I'd like to make a second follow-up post "hey that thing I posted was crap," but I'm not real familiar with the people in this space or who's trustworthy.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As if anyone's been making the distinction between "laid off" and "fired" when talking about these corporate restructurings.

They lost their jobs. They no longer work there. That's what they're saying, and that's what they're trying to say. Words have different connotations in different contexts, and those contexts can be inferred by listening to the other words that they've said.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah. It's not real relevant to the core discussion but it seems like everyone involved has been saying "laid off in December"; I have no idea where the desire to debunk "fired" came from since I don't think anyone's saying fired (and yes the distinction will be a little arbitrary anyway if it turns out someone is saying it.)

To the wider point - I'm moderately convinced now that the video is, in fact, bogus; I'm just waiting to hear a little more and then if it seems like it checks out I plan to make a follow-up post with the right information.