this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1367 points (95.7% liked)

memes

10338 readers
2270 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Imagine if we could hook up Bittorrent and Bitcoin somehow, and made it so you could create a torrent of your work and get some money when people download.

And then people who seed it could maybe get a little cut for helping to host things. And you'd buy tokens and you'd know that almost 100% of the money goes to the artist, and the artist has control over the entire process.

That would be neat, but I'm sure someone here will explain why this is unworkable and stupid. Which is why I posted it.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Imagine YouTube reposts stealing merger ad revenue but it's your main revenue instead.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's definitely a hard problem we'd have to solve.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago

"What we need are stronger copyright laws."

- Disney lawyers, probably

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

99% of revenue would go to the first copycats that can feasibly pretend the works are theirs, and dominate the space with their own seeder bots.

Democracy is nice, but…it needs a bit of regulation and enforcement. You’d end up slowly building up a lot of the rules that currently dictate digital purchases, sans corruption.

[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Eight hours later, and no one disagreed.

I think you might be on to something

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You don't need special digital scam money to do this. You can just go buy the thing directly from the creator/the creator's agent. If the creator wanted to go through the trouble of self-publishing, they'd have just done that.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Good luck doing that with current laws and what happens if the artist doesn't want to share their work anymore?

What's funny is that in theory NFTs could have been used for something like that (proof of ownership of a digital good that can be resold), the problem being that you will rely on a third party platforms to authenticate and download the things you own as it can't realistically be stored on the blockchain...