5
submitted 4 years ago by DrivingForce@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Holy cannoli!

One of the captured bar proprietors noticed that the pertinent association, Umih, never noticed this necessity while reestablishing his permit:

“No one, not even the experts of Umih who give obligatory preparing as a component of a permit IV resumption, to me never said I should keep this set of experiences.”

In light of inquiries by BFM Business, Umih conceded that the preparation doesn’t make reference to WiFi logging yet noticed that Umih individuals ought to have thought about this significant prerequisite since it was referenced in a bulletin.

So they even had to get accredited when standing up the WiFi, the accreditation organization didn't mention it, then when charged with a crime have the audacity to say, "well, I mean, he should have known."

My brother in Christ, this guy just owns a coffee shop. Why on earth should he be deep in the weeds on technical regulations.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2020
5 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31366 readers
873 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS