this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
455 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
4094 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Real men don't need props.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago (4 children)

That's why i never understood the angle of guns and big trucks are things deemed manly. I live on a super steep place, when i see dudes on bicycles, just huffing up there like a machine, i always think: what a bloke. When i see some ridiculous truck in my small town i just see a clown. Same with guns, it's okay you're scared of the worldbor think you'rs some sort of redneck aveenger.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I don't understand why you think only rednecks have firearms. The world has changed, a large majority of firearm owners are not rednecks. Trump helped that.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but I've met very few lefties who advertise it. Owning a gun isn't really a part of most people's personality if they aren't crazy people.

I like responsible gun ownership. You should be required to show competence with your firearm, both in usage an maintenance and storage, to own it though. You should have to go through a course (funded by taxes to ensure poorer people aren't left out) before your purchase, and probably prove you have a safe place to store it and knowledge on how and why to store it.

(Firearms are the most stolen item, and the idiots with unsecured firearms or in safes locked with "1776" have caused part of the illegal gun crises.)

[–] ____@infosec.pub 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Seems reasonable to me - I got my state’s id card for ownership of a firearm, and just haven’t felt compelled to take the 16 hour class for a carry permit.

TBH, I have some concerns about the intersection of fed law and legal marijuana states that I’d rather not risk being the test case for.

You bring up a very valid point about funding of the course and equity. On further reflection, anyone who wants to learn ought to have access, whether they want to own/carry, or not.

The more educated and responsible citizens, the fewer sanctimonious fools who think “good guys with guns” stand a chance of stopping a motivated shooter with an assault rifle.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

TBH, I have some concerns about the intersection of fed law and legal marijuana states that I’d rather not risk being the test case for.

IANAL, but I think the consensus is that the form asking about previous addiction or drug use is unconstitutional, but it hasn't really been tested. The issue is you need the resources and time to actually take it up to a high enough level to matter. Generally it's just not enforced. Either way, it's better to just not be in a position to worry about it if you don't feel the need.

You bring up a very valid point about funding of the course and equity.

If it's a constitutional right (which I don't think it is because the second amendment is talking about something else, but that doesn't matter) then everyone should have equal access. Any barriers should not be based on class, race, gender, or anything else unreasonable. I would even go so far as to argue there should be ways to help people pay for them if they can't afford their own. If owning a gun is good for the rich, it's good for the poor. All this would obviously need training and education first obviously, and then checks to ensure they aren't just taking advantage of it, like selling it. If poor people had equal access to firearms though, I'm sure conservatives would be a lot faster with regulation.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I think many of the guys out there carrying in a big truck are simply cosplaying what they think a "real man" is. They want to be cowboys in their shiny F150 trucks with Carhartts and a pistol, but actually work a desk job and have no need for any of it.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Cyclists are some of the most badass athletes on the planet. Go watch them race the Tour De France or the Giro De Italia and those dudes are blasting 120 miles every day in any weather for a month.

Some hillbilly wouldn't make it past the first half of the first day.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Lol @redneck avenger. Gonna use that one!