this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
319 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
4098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Manually attacking your adversary is so 1900s. Train a MASSIVE ai on every classified hacking methodology/procedure document in existence, give it the adversary's IP ?range, and press GO.

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Hacking is too complex to be automated like that - for now at least. Especially the AI buzzword is useless in this context. There are a lot of attempts to automate the process, but none of them come close to manual review by an experienced professional.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Even if only one in a million succeed, it's still able to try those million damn fast. And it's only going to get better logarithmically.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

That would just cause chaos. Which might benefit the attacker but I think you’d be better off with smaller targeted strikes using the secret catalog of CIA/NSA hacking tools already available to them. Or I suppose why not do both.