this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
680 points (88.6% liked)

> Greentext

7547 readers
3 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brianary@startrek.website 105 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It was also the time when she watched a man die to save her life.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago (2 children)

He didn't even have to, mythbusters did a show on it lol

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Idk why you’re being downvoted. They did, and you’re right. A door of that size made with accurate wood could hold two adult men out of the water when they removed their life vests and put them under the door.

If Jack and Rose had done the same, they would have increased the chance of survival for both of them by both being out of the water and having double the body heat to warm each other.

[–] ShustOne@lemmy.one 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They try in the movie and it causes them both to be in the freezing water. It wasn't about him being able to float, it was about them both not freezing to death.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

They don’t put the life vests under the door in the movie, which is the key detail tested by the Mythbusters.

[–] Grellan@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago

Because you missed in the same episode during that part where David Cameron said that Leo's character dying was what had to happen. That was the story. It is a pointless gotcha, based on the movie not spending the time to determine the exact amount of buoyancy of a ship wreck.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did they come up with that idea while floating in sub-freezing water, after having just experienced multiple near-death scenarios, while afraid for their lives? The reality is that it's easy to solve a problem in a lab, not so much under duress.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You just described an average day on Mythbusters.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

My favorite episodes are where they're testing the prowess of some legendary athlete or fighter, and they, being two out of shape nerds, would try the feat, be unable to do it, and be like "MYTH BUSTED!". I was glad to see when they called in an actual master of ninjitsu to test if a ninja can catch arrows, after they themselves were unable to even get close to catching one. That ninja actually did it too! Snatched some arrows right out of the air.

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago

yeah because being in the open ocean in subzero temperatures is the moment that one will think "sure, better take my life vest off and strap it on this fucking door. I bet it will hold the door afloat and I will always be attached to this door. What can go wrong?"

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How would you keep the life vests under the door in an ocean?

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They have straps to tie them on you. You tie them together and hold them under the door. Or use any of the other crap floating in the ocean. Literally anything could be held in a shirt or pants. You can inflate your pants themselves by tying the legs together and blowing air into the waistband.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I imagine it would be quite difficult to tie knots with frozen limbs and fingers, in the dark. And trying to get a second person on the door would have required the already freezing girl to dip into the water. I can see why they wouldn't try it.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure but they didn't have Mythbusters on air when the Titanic sank.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No but Jamie was having his 60th birthday on the Titanic at the time lol