this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
141 points (96.7% liked)

Science

13216 readers
52 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why we can’t have nice things!

[–] iraq_lobster@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

well african people get accessible internet, at the expense of scientific research. which one would be more relevant to humanity? one might ask..

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how much of the internet in Africa is actually served by Starlink?

Africa is a massive continent with a wealth of countries with varying demographics, it’s no wonder that they have a 40% internet penetration rate compared to the world average 60%.

I don’t think Starlink is going to change that.

[–] iraq_lobster@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

yea, after much thought, i doubt starlink to be yet profitable in africa

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I hope it stays that way. Africa doesn’t need more greedy white billionaires leeching from them.

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Why does it have to be “profitable”??

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It's not just developing nations, even developed nations have areas people live that aren't viable to run fibre connections to.