this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
721 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

11081 readers
2637 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The point of pi is that it’s non-repeating

[–] Jenztsch@feddit.de 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Take a look at 0.101001000100001... This number is also non-repeating, but obviously doesn't contain all numbers with finite digits.

The property you're looking for is called to be a normal number. Pi is assumed to be one, but it hasn't yet been proven.

However, in a sense this is an unremarkable property as almost all real numbers are normal. :)

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -2 points 10 months ago

but obviously doesn’t contain all numbers with finite digits.

I was just claiming possibility because we haven’t calculated the infinite string

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

At work at the moment so can't go deep into it. But I think you misunderstand what non repeating numbers mean. Of course there are repeating numbers within pi which is fine, the issue would be if ALL the digits were to simply cycle over and repeat themselves. If however there are a few trillion digits then a series of 1's and 0's for ever, pi is still non repeating

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Did you read what I responded to?

It could just become a series of 1’s repeating forever.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I did read it, I also wrote it. Wasn't trying to put you down or anything just sharing a bit of knowledge I found interesting. I know many people (my self included at one point) assumed pi would have to include everything when that just isn't true. Apologies if I did a bad job explaining it though

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 months ago

I wasn’t clear then, it’s not that it has to

It’s that it can until calculated