this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
459 points (91.7% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3512 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 185 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Trump is clearly a moron with some kind of clinical brain dysfunction, but this is just like 2 seconds of fumbling with words, which pretty much anyone who does public speaking can do. I was expecting more than like 2 second's worth based on how big a deal the story sounded like.

IDK, maybe Newsweek is trying to run cover for him by running a big non-story about something innocuous to distract from the Nikki Haley / Nancy Pelosi thing.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 16 points 9 months ago

I really don't understand Newsweek.

Right, it's one or two words he fumbles. His cognitive decline has been observed since 2016, nothing new here.

The article first says the video "is stoking concern among social media users" which, if you ask me, is not something news worthy. But then it goes on to point out how this was re-posted by the Biden campaign. Which does seems a little more of interest than just a bunch of yahoos on twitter pointing fingers.

Newsweek seems to always have a bullshit story above the fold and something somewhat relevant below it.

[–] thesprongler@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This clip is pretty much on par with everything that tumbles out of his mouth. "Until you're vetted and everything else" is what I heard. I'm so sick of non-stories about Trump when there are so so so many credible things to attack him for.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I found your comment by searching for "Until you're vetted". It was easy enough to understand what he was saying that I was able to just search for the words I heard and find them here.

It's easy to hear what he's saying, sure he's "slurring the words", but it's not like a drunk slurring the words, or like he's had a stroke. He's just speaking in a sloppy way, not enunciating his words. There's a clear difference from earlier speeches where the words he was speaking were gibberish, but his enunciation was better. But, so what? What does that prove?

The Nikky Haley thing was a bigger gaffe, and more likely to indicate his not thinking correctly. But, again, it's just a gaffe. Biden also made plenty of gaffes, even when he was much younger.

None of this matters though. What matters is what will happen if Trump becomes president again. His first term resulted in all kinds of damage, and that's despite the fact that he didn't really have the Republican establishment behind him, and that so many of his staff were inexperienced. This time the main reason he's running is to be able to pardon himself from various crimes. He's going to have the new republican party behind him pushing extreme ideas, and he's going to be out for vengeance for all his enemies.

I really hope that going after him for "slurring his words" isn't actually an effective strategy for the Biden team, because if it's the kind of thing that actually sways votes, it shows how bad things really are in the US.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

The Nikki/Pelosi thing is more than a gaffe. It's not like he said one name when he meant the other, a mixup anyone can make. No, he actually confused the people the way a person with Alzheimer's does.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago

Your take seems the most plausible to me, especially considering the clip they link to is super super short and removes any context.

I immediately wondered why this was a story given that clip.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The last time Newsweek reported on him 🙄

You have a twice-impeached president but focus on this?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah. I'm becoming more and more convinced that Newsweek is blowing up non-stories about Trump to dilute genuine criticism of him by creating a "stupid criticism of Trump that has no merit" bucket in people's minds.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

For-profit media doing whatever is most profitable, which is clickbait and gossip.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Could assume their viewership only reads headlines and conservatives ignore it anyway?

[–] ediculous@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago

You aren't wrong about any of this, but let's not forget that a split second "BYAAAAAH" (Howard Dean) can tank an entire presidential run if it gets media attention.

With that said, Trump has had dozens of these blunders over the years. It means nothing.