this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
80 points (97.6% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
80
French MPs want to amend EU's copyright rules to cover generative AI (www.euractiv.com)
submitted 10 months ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/europe@feddit.de
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"How to identify original works by artists? How to attribute works generated by AI intermediaries? How to remunerate authors whose works have been used? How to manage opt-outs for artists who refuse their content to be used by AI? These are the questions that require a review of the copyright directive in light of generative AI,” says Mireille Clapot, the Member of Parliament leading on the opinion and President of France's National Assembly’s High Commission for Digital and Posts (CNSP).

Although Clapot and her colleagues welcome the AI Act, they believe the Copyright Directive will have to be amended because of the recent technological developments in AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If you are not engaging with my main argument: personal and intimate relationship between art and artist, I don't really see a point in conversation. And I think that an individual does also have right to be protected from society.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don’t value your main argument.

I think the needs of the many outweigh the feelings of the artist.

It’s the next level of the death of the author. The authors connection to the work is irrelevant compare to the readers.

Give the artist a reasonable time frame to earn some money off their work if they want and let it go free.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Fair, than we fundamentally disagree on nature and value of art and even the role of society and individuals. That would be a rather long discussion to have.

[–] shottymcb@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And if the whole world's singing your songs And all of your paintings have been hung Just remember what was yours Is everyone's from now on

And that's not wrong or right But you can struggle with it all you like You'll only get uptight

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

Not sure how that is related to my argument, but even less sure why artists seem to be the only people who don't deserve to own the product of their work. But yeah, sounds nice and poetic.