this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
860 points (97.8% liked)

Work Reform

10000 readers
566 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Image Transcription: Text


Dear Sundar,

I have appreciated our recent dialogue concerning Alphabet's cost base. I am encouraged to see that you are now taking some action to right size Alphabet's cost base and understand that it is never an easy decision to let people go.

I argued in my previous letter that Alphabet's headcount has grown beyond what is required operationally. Over the last 5 years, Alphabet more than doubled its headcount, adding over 100,000 employees, of which over 30,000 were added in the first 9 months of 2022 alone. The decision to cut 12,000 jobs is a step in the right direction, but it does not even reverse the very strong headcount growth of 2022. Ultimately management will need to go further.

I believe that management should aim to reduce headcount to around 150,000, which is in line with Alphabet's headcount at the end of 2021. This would require a total headcount reduction in the order of 20%.

Importantly, management should also take the opportunity to address excessive employee compensation. The median salary at Alphabet in 2021 amounted to nearly $300,000, and the average salary is much higher. Competition for talent in the technology industry has fallen significantly allowing Alphabet to materially reduce compensation per employee. In particular, Alphabet should limit stock-based compensation given the depressed share price.

I hope to have further dialogue with you on these matters in due course.

Yours sincerely

[Signature]

Christopher Hohn

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Some people transcribe posts on the internet as a matter of public service.

A picture of text is not particularly accessible to the blind. But written text, well they can zoom that significantly without reducing clarity, if they have some vision…or they can use any text-to-speech tool.

I don’t know a lot of poorly sighted people though. I’m assuming that they have some sort of font packages they use that scale well to large sizes for increased legibility, just like there are fonts specifically to help with dyslexia.

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 months ago

My comment is in relation to the content in case you're being serious..

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

All fonts scale well since they are vector, so a blind person would not need a specialized font. If you want to learn about how some blind people use computers here is a video about one persons workflow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBoeoIqtI1I