this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
83 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Panamanap@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are right, it is possible for an individual.

But this is not about an individual but about a society. Poor people will be less likely to achieve this diet. (Less time, more stress, less education).

[โ€“] letmesleep@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

True. But continuing to subsidizing meat (without those it would never have been affordable) is the least efficient way to go about it. Saving the money (if we include the environmental costs we're easily in the hundreds of billions per year for Europe alone) that goes into subsidies for livestock, could pay for a lot of programs that make plant-based healthy eating more widespread. By education, but also by targeted subsidizing of healthy foods.

Edit: Also: Meat being take off the menu by prices makes it more complicated to obtain amino acids, but it also has a lot of positive side effects. Red meat and especially processed products cause quite a bit of problems. Heck, maybe we should bring back rationing.

[โ€“] Panamanap@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Wholeheartedly agree, since we are talking about societal measures.