Technology

37719 readers

111 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

233

You're Not Imagining It: Google Search Results Are Getting Worse, Study Finds (gizmodo.com)

submitted 10 months ago by tardigrada@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For the past few years, a growing number of users, analysts, and experts raised alarms about a truth that feels obvious to a lot of people who surf around in web browsers: the quality of Google results is in serious decline. Google disagrees.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Google search results suck and I've actually heard regular people mention it. They just either don't know how to switch search engines or they think Bing search sucks.

[–] blargerer@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

Bing and Bing based searches have also gotten worse. The study in question actually says they preform worse than google. Its all Goodhart's law in action.

[–] hannes3120@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Or they still think they are entitled to a "free" search engine and don't see the amount of resources needed for that and that it's actually a service worth paying for, either through a subscription or through a donation-based service.

Switching one private company for another is definitely not the way to go...

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

Or they're working class or buried in medical bills and can't afford to be spending money on things like search engines that have a free alternative, even if it is worse.

I'm not actually convinced the alternatives are any better here, anyway.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Subscription services still get worse. The arrogance Cable TV must have to show us ads—cable was the ad-free service back in its day. The same is happening with Netflix. The same will happen with Spotify. This thing is a snake eating it's own fucking tail.

I want something without perverse incentives. Donations, maybe. Taxes, possibly. I get free roads, why not a free search index.

[–] moon_matter@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Careful about how you throw around the word "entitlement". The top competition is free and search engines are very low value for the average person. It's very reasonable to expect search engines to be free and for anything paid to be a niche product. Google search results may be terrible, but not so terrible that I'm going to pay $5/month to escape it.

[–] ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

Amazingly Google is still the best unpaid search engine, as bad as it has become. Terrible websites have completely taken over the web. To find actual information you need access ProQuest or EBESCOhost or something like that, though their indexes are much smaller.