Technology

37724 readers

559 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

251

Evernote Lays Off Most of Staff, Triggering Fears of Closure (www.thurrott.com)

submitted 1 year ago by dirtmayor@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] simple@lemmy.mywire.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

They are very similar. The main differences are:

LogSeq uses bullet points. Obsidian is just pure markdown
LogSeq is open source. Obsidian is closed source
LogSeq has a predefined structure to it (folders). Obsidian allows you to have whatever folders you want

Personally, I use LogSeq for my day to day work. Primarily because I prefer the bullet point approach when taking notes. But some people would prefer writing long continuous text with Obsidian.

So to each their own. If you're interested, try both (they're both using markdown, so you can transfer between the two). I went back and forth a few times before settling with LogSeq