this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
657 points (96.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32472 readers
880 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So I agree that's how it works with businesses under Anglo-Saxon style capitalism, but I disagree with that's how it works across the world with large companies. There are large multinational corporations that are ethical. Not as successful in profitability as Microsoft, but they are more successful ethically and better for society.

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Quite possibly. I wouldn't know. Either way, Microsoft is an American company and plays by (or subverts, or writes) American rules.

Money is power. Get enough of either and you get corruption. Some people fight the system, some people learn to profit off it. If it doesn't work that way in other parts of the world, then it's because their systems work differently than ours.

Edit: quite possibly, not quit possibly. I'm a touch typist. I type every day. So why does my typing get worse with age?

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Yes, what you're describing is called the "Social Structure of Accumulation" in Political Economic theory.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd argue that American and some Western European companies are much more ethical than African child labor mines, Chaebol, and Zaibatsu

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

I'd argue that too. Empirically en aggregate though.