this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
133 points (76.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
4906 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

People recently invented a fancy thing called compromise. It means you can choose your second best preference if your first is not available.

E.g. I would preffer steak for lunch but I will take pizza over being hungry.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

when saying what we ought to do, there is no need for compromise at all

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yep, sounds like US politics in a nutshell

[–] Girru00@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, compromise on your morals, just like a good ol' steak vs pizza

[–] chocosoldier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

do you compromise your morals and throw the switch, killing only one person, or stick to your moral convictions and allow it to kill five by your inaction?

[–] Girru00@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, life imprisonment, the greatest way to empower a murderer to kill... i guess other people in prison... who should be killed.. so they wont kill each other... or...?

[–] chocosoldier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

well actually i meant was choosing harm reduction is better than tossing your hands up and doing nothing when your ideal isn't an option but if you want to pretend that's what i meant that's fine. par for the course on this instance.

[–] Girru00@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Harm reduction? You put together a poorly worded argument and want to pretend people are misconstruing what you're saying. Currently, effectively, most if not all lethal injections are on hold. Care to explain what "harm reduction" you're supporting so people "dont pretend you mean what you don't mean."