this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
289 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3368 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This country has never been a country that debates.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Kennedy famously trounced Nixon because he crushed him in the debate (mostly by looking better, but, also, he was Nixon and his ideas sucked)

Lincoln straight up master debatered his way to the White House after the Lincoln-Douglas debates made him famous.

The problem is not that America hasn't had a debate tradition. The problem is that the last forty years it's been neoliberals debating each other about how to suck less until now it's neoliberals vs fascists and they're, ya know, fascists.

There isn't a debate. They just lie and rage about their made up enemies.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

No offense, but if you've got to go back to Lincoln/Douglas for your most convincing argument for how the United States has a tradition of debate, I think you've lost the argument before you've finished your point.

Nixon/Kennedy, while often represented as a style vs substance debate (it wasn't, Kennedy largely one on both based on broader polling than is generally trotted out, but his good looks to a televised audience certainly helps) is still more than two DECADES before the timetable you're trying to lay out here.

[–] TedKaczynski@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The United States is a dying country. Be smart, pack your bags, and get to Europe or Canada.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

Canada is only ever a couple steps behind America. Our own right wing party took notes from 2016 US elections and are currently implementing them pretty successfully.

Empty platform, just snarky mud slinging and vacuous pandering. And it's working.

[–] pyromaster55@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Do you know how hard it is to legally immigrate to another country, especially for the majority of folks?

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Oh you mean the countries that can’t defend themselves? Woefully unprepared for large scale war?

Also, you’re blind as fuck if you think Canada isn’t gong through it, same with Britain and others in the eu

This rise of fascism isn’t localized just to the us

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

The likes of Canada, Australia, and (to varying degrees) Europe are slowly trudging their way toward fascism, but the US is attempting a speedrun at the moment. That's a far greater threat than large scale war.

I don't think it's likely, but it's a very real possibility that this will be the last meaningful election to be held in the US for the foreseeable future. The same can't really be said for the others.