Literally the first image in that page is a picture of Singapores public housing, and a claim that they have the highest home ownership rates in the world.

It’s nearly as if public housing can work?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Public housing can work but not without addressing poverty. Using Singapore, which has the death penalty for drug use isn't comparable.

Otherwise it only makes it worse by concentrating poverty into a ghetto.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Using Singapore, which has the death penalty for drug use isn’t comparable.

I need you to draw a clear through line to why that's related to public housing policy in any given country.

I'm also gonna like, cite the soviet bloc style apartments, or china's rapid urbanization in around the same time period that the US decided to make public housing be a thing. I know for the soviet lunchboxes, you had your standard complaints of, oh, long wait lists, subpar build quality, yadda yadda, and then of course towards the beginning of the program you had a large issue with people who had previously been unindustrialized farmers basically just not knowing how to live in an apartment, shit like having your pigs stay indoors and stuff like that. I think similar issues were/are probably a part of chinese publicly subsidized housing complexes. I think barcelona's superblocks are also publicly subsidized but I don't know to what extent, and they seem to be working out pretty good. Now those are all places that provide publicly subsidized housing and have provided it to those who were pretty impoverished at the time. They also had/have (again idk barcelona don't even know why I brought it up) work programs and shit, which we used to have in america, so that might contribute to your point more, but I still think, you know, it is bad to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. The projects were majorly flawed, but they are probably preferable to the whole like. rust belt suburban crime shit. I dunno, realistically it doesn't really matter what context an apartheid ghetto scenario is happening in, because it's going to have basically the same consequences on everyone involved.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I need you to draw a clear through line to why that’s related to public housing policy in any given country.

Drug use is rampant among the poor because it provides escape for some and profit for others. But it is destructive to communities creating greater poverty.

Singapore has draconian crime laws where you will be whipped for graffiti and executed for drug use. It creates a safer culture but at what cost?

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Is that what's created their safer culture, though, or is that just something that they also have? uhhh ummm the nordic countries the nordic countries! you ever heard of those! everybody loves those for all their cool examples of policies! no but fr like, portugal with their decriminalization has also had success in eliminating large swathes of their drug problem, oregon, not so much. So I question whether or not it's that singapore is really having success with their draconian tactics "but at what cost", or if the draconian tactics are just a secondary element, and then they're also just doing other shit that would cut down on their drug problem, like having disproportionate funding for their DEA equivalent. I dunno, I just find it hard to believe that draconian crime policy is doing the heavy lifting there, cause those come with some pretty heavy caveats in most places.

I dunno singapore might just kind of equivalent to a slightly more privileged hell joseon though so what do I know.