this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
164 points (93.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3573 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley claimed the US has “never been a racist county” during an interview with Fox News on Tuesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Nikki... Why is there a North and South Carolina?

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago

And a Virginia and West Virginia?

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They were difficult to administer together?

Both had slavery, but South Carolina was a shipping hub for the British in their exploitation of the Caribbean. They had a huge slave trade.

The north on the other hand was poorer, and was mostly populated with farmers. (many of whom used slave labor).

So the colonies were split apart in 1712. The split was completely peaceful. After all, a colonist was considered a subject of the crown first and foremost. At least until some got a bit uppity about 50 years later.


The split you were probably thinking about was Virginia and West Virginia. That one was 100% a split over slavery at the start of the civil war.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Ummm... partial credit.

You should have mentioned that those poorer northern farmers were mostly former indentured workers who weren't allowed to resettle in the southern areas due to stigma against them.

Of course, Ms. Haley would probably also mention that that was pre-revolution and thus doesn't really count.

She's also stated that the civil war was a states rights issue (blerg) and also doesn't count.

You know what would count, though?

The Asian Exclusion acts of 1875, 1885, 1917, and 1924. All of which had popular support.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Disagreements over states rights, probably.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Surely it was over states ups and downs? Or else it’d be East and West Carolina.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Virginia and West Virginia

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

And what rights were those?

[–] xor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

strong disagreements over state's rights vs federal government /s