this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
533 points (99.1% liked)

News

23287 readers
5140 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The FDA and HHS have already made their recommendations to reschedule. Now the DEA gets to weigh in, then there’s a period for public comment. ~~After that, IIRC, the FDA makes a final decision~~. The current recommendation is to Schedule III from Schedule I.

but that’s just for rescheduling on a federal level.

edit: correction-- it's the DEA who makes the ultimate decision.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately the DEA is the agency that makes the final decision. I have less faith in them to do the right thing on this than the FDA. Though the new head Biden appointed specifically called for a review of the scheduling, which could be a signal the DEA is receptive to dropping it. Schedule I for marijuana is a joke. I mean, you could make an argument caffeine is more dangerous. Even just lowering it to another level could make a big difference in the states it's legal.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately the DEA is the agency that makes the final decision.

ok, i just looked into this, and you're correct. my mistake.

Regarding their stance... i think this could go either way, and it's most likely to be a bit of a compromise, leaning into the FDA and HHS recommendation, as, historically, they've kid of ridden the fence on the issue, often giving a token, "we enforce the law," type of answer when questioned about their stance on the subject.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, that's a good overview.

Schedule III is still too harsh, imo, though.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

agreed. Schedule IV or descheduling altogether would be most fitting. The fact that it's a legitimate medication for many conditions and is still the subject of a great deal of research muddies the waters a bit, however.