this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
176 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
408 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PaddleMaster@beehaw.org 39 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Gross. Can we start making fines meaningful? % of revenue maybe? I’m not an expert on this. But these fines should be more than enough to discourage behavior and not be “cost of doing business”.

[–] Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The EU knows fines of 'up to' 4% of revenue for privacy violations, which means the company still gets to keep 96% of whatever it's made by breaking the law. The fine should be a minimum of 50%, plus jail time for the managers responsible. Any punishment that does not make the shareholders cry with fury is too low and will do nothing to change the situation.

[–] B0rax@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, they don’t get to keep 96%. It is revenue, not profit. That is a big difference.

[–] Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

I'm well aware of the difference (see my other posts). But it still means that even with the maximum fine, a revenue of 100 billion is still a revenue of 96 billion. Even with an unrealistically low profit margin of 10% it was still worth it to them.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We need a total revolution. The people who ought to be fined are the ones buying the laws.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Total revolutions tend to eat their children. Those who are already the most vulnerable in the old system tend to be in the most precarious situation in the new one as well. What we actually need is careful and gradual reform, based on democratic principles, instead of revoluzzers imposing their will upon the rest of the population, which is how most revolutions end.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 7 points 10 months ago

My country is literally an oligarchy, not a democracy. The oligarchs don't want to gradually reform based on democratic principles. But they sure want us to think they will.