this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
103 points (100.0% liked)

Reddit Migration

19 readers
2 users here now

### About Community Tracking and helping #redditmigration to Kbin and the Fediverse. Say hello to the decentralized and open future. To see latest reeddit blackout info, see here: https://reddark.untone.uk/

founded 1 year ago
 

Data shows the micro-blogging website has been shedding users since early 2023, not long after Elon Musk’s takeover

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesdogishere@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

for the sake of humanity, pls permaban threads from using activityhub etc if it in any way uses data shared with kbin/lemmy. threads is an abominatin - it doesn't show you when people mention you in replies, and it selectively shows you things which only zuckerprick wants to show you. so posts are not even shown chronologically, threads just doesn't bother to show you all the posts.

threads is clearly a vehicle for fascist control of the population, far more than twitter ever was. pls protect kbin/lemmy from being infected or else when threads is affected by political scandals, kbin/lemmy will be affected.

WHY IS KBIN/LEMMY NOT CLARIFYING THAT FACEBOOK THREADS IS BANNED ALREADY?????

[–] exohuman@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threads isn’t federated yet with anyone. The functionality is not there. When/if it does try to federate it will be with Mastodon instances, not kbin/Lemmy.

[–] hypelightfly@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Kbin does federate with Mastodon instances and supports microblogs.

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Is this satire?

[–] fearout@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threads aren't even federated yet. There's nothing to defederate or ban.

[–] Bozicus@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

It is apparently possible to add “threads.net” to a defederation/ban list even though there’s no actual communication yet. It gives peace of mind to people who want to drop the portcullis on all commercial interests. But in practical terms, you’re right, there’s nothing to ban.

[–] Kara@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

You cannot block someone from using activitypub, that just simply is not how it works.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With all due respect, please touch grass. "For the sake of humanity"? "Zuckerprick"? "A vehicle for fascist control of the population"?

You sound like a thirteen year old.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

To be fair, Facebook employs a man named Joel Kaplan as their head of Global Policy. Formerly their head of US Policy, Formerly a Bush White House Toady.

Kaplan is the reason who all the right-wing conspiracy websites pretending to be news orgs weren't banned from Facebook news feeds. He personally exempted them all from community standards and Facebook terms of service about lying and shit. He then ordered left leaning news to be scrutinized more heavily.

He's been stuffing the ranks of Facebook's middle and upper management with loyalty tested conservatives.

Kaplan also refused to make changes to the algorithm that would have helped fight hate speech, because anger and outrage drive higher engagement.

He's also ignoring at least three ongoing racial cleansings that are being actively powered by Facebook, because they're happening in countries that are not the US.

So in a way, it really is a vehicle for the fascist control of the population, or at least a fascist friendly media stream.