this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
53 points (89.6% liked)

Linux

48186 readers
1298 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
53
Jump from Arch to NixOS? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by andrew0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

As the title implies, should I do it? I love Arch so far, and I can fix most issues that pop out. However, I sometimes wish to start fresh without too much hassle, but I get a feeling NixOS isn't as mature as Arch.

Have any of you used both, and if so, what do you miss from Arch? What are you grateful for in NixOS?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=DMQWirkx5EY

https://piped.video/watch?v=fuWPuJZ9NcU

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] Blaze@iusearchlinux.fyi 17 points 1 year ago
[–] WreckingBANG@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago
[–] ancientweasel@social.fossware.space 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

use Arch to manage your system packages and use Nix to manage your user & GUI packages

Brilliant. Thanks.

[–] Laser@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I agree it's nice to have access to nixpkgs' packages in other OSs (I've never did this so take the following with a grain of salt), it is my opinion that you're missing out on the biggest features if you don't fully opt for the nix approach.

I wouldn't reduce the nix tools to a package manager. It's a set to interact with the nix language, which primarily is a language to build a system from. You have the biggest advantage when you know that your system only consists of components built from your set of instructions (of course this pulls in a lot of stuff from nixpkgs) because that brings your system closer to reproducibility. It also makes it more consistent.

I am allowed to use Ubuntu or Fedora (I would use the Fedora but they seemed to have fucked it up) at work. I use Arch for personal. This seams like a good way to learn Nix. I am probably never leaving Arch. It's like a member of my family.

Oh, even better. I'm going to put it on the Ubuntu desktop my employer wants me to use.