this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
886 points (98.6% liked)

News

23300 readers
4495 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Almost nobody says we should have the richest pay the least. And yet when we look around the country, the vast majority of states have tax systems that do just that."

Nearly every state and local tax system in the U.S. is fueling the nation's inequality crisis by forcing lower- and middle-class families to contribute a larger share of their incomes than their rich counterparts, according to a new study published Tuesday.

Titled Who Pays?, the analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) examines in detail the tax systems of all 50 U.S. states, including the rates paid by different income segments.

In 41 states, ITEP found, the richest 1% are taxed at a lower rate than any other income group. Forty-six states tax the top 1% at a lower rate than middle-income families.

Report: https://itep.org/whopays-7th-edition/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

In Washington, home of the Microsoft Millionaire every-fucking-where, oddly enough has no state income tax.

But oddly enough it has a huge problem with unhoused people.

[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, when did "the homeless" become "unhoused people"? I'm just beginning to notice this shift in language. Has the word homeless become derogatory?

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The word home has a lot of subtext attached to it, a lot of it relating to feelings of belonging, so I think the idea is to make a phrase that doesn't have a little bit of subtext implying they don't belong anywhere. Houseless would accomplish a similar thing but unhoused seems to be the result of that line of thought.

[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, that makes sense. I'm often suspicious of new euphemisms that make people feel like a problem is less of a problem than it really is. I'm all for more accurate language.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Anytime, I feel like it's probably one of those things that's going to be most noticed by the people who are called unhoused instead, though I'm certain not everyone will like it the same amount or even at all.

[–] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So does California and many other states with state income tax? Is there evidence of a correlation between state income tax and unhoused people?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that there is no correlation between zero income tax and massive unhouse population and social issues. /s

[–] Daveyborn@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm honestly curious on that, I'm in Florida and tripping over homeless people.