this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
62 points (94.3% liked)

Linux

48186 readers
1225 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello fellow lemmings! Fedora KDE user here, and quite happy about it, it didn't break a single time and packages are up to date. The only thing that bother me is DNF's speed... a single search may take up to 5 seconds, and if I'm dependency-hunting I may need several searches, summing up the delays. I'm asking if switching to openSUSE Tumbleweed could be a good idea or not. The idea of the rolling release is really intriguing, whole system upgrades always makes me nervous, and zypper, being written in C++, should be faster than DNF.

I would stick to Wayland KDE, as my current fedora setup.

Other than this, I don't see any other obvious pros or cons, so I'm asking you: why should I switch and why shouldn't I? any tips from someone who used both?

thanks in advance!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BioMando@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you’re changing for the sake of package manager speed, don’t. The few seconds here and there don’t really amount to much.

However, tumbleweed, being a rolling release, to me, means that it kind of killed the distro hopping adiction. Everything is stable and updated frequently (albeit not bleeding edge, as to have time to test the packages)

[–] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you’re changing for the sake of package manager speed, don’t.

It's not the only motivation, but the one that convinced me to look around after more than 2 years on fedora. The rolling release is another motivation

[–] BioMando@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Then give tumbleweed a try! I think you’ll like what it offers.

[–] fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Fedora also has a rolling release version called rawhide

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I couldn't get on with TW when I tried it because because of very large updates, time-consuming updates appearing at random. Is that something you find? I prefer the predictability of Fedora.

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The beauty of Tumbleweed is that you don't have to update straight away. I typically update weekly but on my play-puter I have gone 18 months between updates without a problem. The updates do tend to be quite large though so a slow Internet connection can take a long time to download them.

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't that a security risk, or can you easily choose to just apply security-important patches? That was the problem I had, I'd see a massive load of new packages and wonder "can I leave this for now or is one of those a critical patch?" On Fedora it's a no-brainer, I just do the upgrade every night and the big version update when I'm ready.

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

It's update all or nothing. Whether it's a security risk or not to leave it for a few days depends on your threat model and as much as I'd like to believe I'm important, mine's minimal.