Fediverse

The single layer web of trust on the server wouldn't be terribly difficult.

A single layer web of trust on a client would mean that the client is getting sufficient information about all the votes to be able to weight them. This means that instead of "+4 -1" for the information that the client gets instead it would get that "shagie liked the object, JohnDoe liked the object, BadGuy liked the object, SomeoneElse liked it, and YetAnotherPerson disliked it." That implies a lot more information being revealed to a client than many would be comfortable with.

Granted all of that is available if you federate with a system and poke in the database. It's there. But this makes it really easy to get that information.

A transitive web of trust implies not only are you getting those votes and considering that "shagie liked the object" but also that you trust me and so that I trust JohnDoe is available to whatever is making that vote weighting calculation.

And while that single layer on the server isn't too eyebrow raising, getting the transitive listing gets into the Facebook level of social graph building - but for all to see. I'm not sure that people would be comfortable with that degree of nakedness of personal information.

Consider also the data payload sizes. This post (rather mundane and not viral) has 243 comments. Some of them have over a hundred votes. How big of a payload do you want to get to send to the vote weigher (and back)?

Consider the load for... say... https://lemm.ee/post/843533

And for bad actors, all they have to do is cast a couple hundred votes on each comment (until they're defederated and the database cleaned up by the admin) to DDOS the vote weigher.