this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
362 points (98.1% liked)

Games

32579 readers
2064 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An Xbox player was given a year-long ban for recording nude scenes in Baldur's Gate 3.

Any clips you record on your Xbox are uploaded to Microsoft's servers by default and may be automatically flagged as explicit content, as /u/Daddy-Vegas on Reddit found out when he automatically received a combined 390 day (4+21+365) suspension from Xbox Live for three clips he recorded.

His first appeal was apparently rejected, but subsequent appeals led to his ban being lifted after the gaming press picked up the story.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] yurgenst@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

No, I don't think I will.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah they’re real hypocritical dick heads

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Being hypocrites is on purpose. It's an expression of power that they can get away with being a hypocrite.

Deep down, it's because they want you to know that their plan is for a world where the law protects them but does not bind them, and anyone who isn't "Christian" enough the law will bind but not protect.

They want you to know that they have power over you because their own hypocrisy don't matter to them.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s an interesting perspective I hadn’t thought of before, and I think you’re right.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I really wish they weren't, but I also agree with them.