Programming

17424 readers

27 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

The C++ scope resolution operator is beautiful (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by 3h5Hne7t1K@lemmy.world to c/programming@programming.dev

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Both zig and go use the dot operator, but I find the '::' operator much more readable.

Vec::new();

Makes it clear that were accessing a static method belonging to the Vec struct/namespace.

Vec.new()

Makes it seem like Vec is an object with a 'new' method.

Am I alone in thinking this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's just convention.

:: is enforced by the compiler.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but does that matter? I don't think, I've ever accidentally broken these conventions, where compiler assistance would have been helpful.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It don't get past review if it doesn't follow standards. I'm yet to see a deviation.

If a language is bad because devs do stupid things, they're all bad.