this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
46 points (88.3% liked)

Videos

14315 readers
253 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Flutter@lemmy.world
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
can@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
46
What The Prisoner's Dilemma Reveals About Life, The Universe, and Everything (youtu.be)
submitted 11 months ago by kid2908@slrpnk.net to c/videos@lemmy.world
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] readthemessage@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As far as I understand, tit for tat will lose most individual duels. But it does cooperate a lot and makes lots of points as a whole. Proactive strategies win more, but they do not cooperate a lot (especially against each other), and in the end, they make fewer points. In real life, annihilating someone would make others not want to cooperate with you. So the options would be either to annihilate everyone or no one.

[โ€“] kid2908@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, from what I understand. If it an one-off encounter (annihilate each other), then tit for tat will lose most of the times. That is original version Prisoner's dilemma and the answer for that version is you all should betray each other. When the scenario is not an one-off encounter but a repeated once then tit for tat will win most of the times.