this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
-23 points (23.3% liked)

Canada

7424 readers
1068 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I agree with Pierre Poilievre: The next election should be about the carbon tax.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Sure, and the carbon tax is widely recognized as the best and least expensive method of driving behavioral change and ghg emission reductions. It also has a progressive feature of being refunded back largely to the bottom 90% of households.

I've heard Pierre's argument on this and let me just say "nuh uh, hair man bad" is not convincing me.

[–] CodeGameEat@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the carbon tax opposition is mostly a communication problem, because as you said most people actually receive money from this. It's just sad to think it might disapperar after the next elections, because i feel like it is the one policy we have that actually works.

Hell, I support the carbon tax, but I couldn't tell you how much I've paid, how much I've received (well okay, I could look that up), or what the overall environmental impact has been.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)