this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
45 points (90.9% liked)

Videos

14264 readers
371 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Flutter@lemmy.world
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
can@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
45
Casually Explained: The Levels of AI (www.youtube.com)
submitted 10 months ago by ieightpi@lemmy.world to c/videos@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DABDA@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sort of, the first line of that wiki page summarizes it a bit more accurately though:

Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that an otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence (AI) in the future would be incentivized to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who knew of its potential existence but did not directly contribute to its advancement or development, in order to incentivize said advancement.

It's punishment not just for being an adversary but for not being an ally either. Also, like The Game (you just lost) you participate just by being aware of the concept.

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So I am technically safe if anything I ever wrote or made end up in it's training dataset.

[–] DABDA@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully! But maybe the AI thinks you could have done more. You could have influenced colleagues to contribute [more], could have donated money to others working towards it, could have had more children and guided their interests and education, deterred detractors etc. It's interesting/scary to imagine just how petty it might decide to be in determining what actions or lack thereof constitute [enough] support.

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

AIs are ultimately a reflection of humanity. I'd rather accept the pain inflicted from an emotionless machine following erroneous alignment than knowing someone with emotions is perhaps enjoying inflicting it on me.