this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
228 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
228
Apple wants AI to run directly on its hardware instead of in the cloud (arstechnica.com)
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Apple wants AI to run directly on its hardware instead of in the cloud::iPhone maker wants to catch up to its rivals when it comes to AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I am really jealous being an android user that Apple usually have this things running on their own devices with more privacy in mind. But I just can't accept the close garden Apple push.

[–] bonnetbee@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They do say that they have privacy in mind. And they are also collecting the same data of their users as Google. Don't be too jealous, they suck just as much as your next Android-Phone company. But with a higher price tag and a walled garden.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They’re both bad, but Apple is clearly less bad about privacy than most big hardware or software companies by far.

[–] bonnetbee@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

How do you know? Because they promise?

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I would change to apple if it weren't for a few annoying bits, mostly to do with the walled garden. Like the appletv I have has a terrible input for typing unless you have an iPhone...so now I want neither.

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I like to own my stuff and have control of it install install whatever I want.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yeah but android is owned by an advertising company, all they want is data. Apple has a better system and less need to push for more data.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 10 months ago

Apple is also an advertizing company, and walled garden ecosystem makes it harder to avoid its reach.

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

But I can removed them instead Apple if they want to track you cant remove it from there. Even on their secure mode the DNS was reaching to Apple servers.

[–] bonnetbee@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Android is not owned by Google, but used and heavily supported by Google. It is open source, you can check how much data bare Android is collecting.

And 'all they want is data' is wrong, too, all they want is money. Same with Apple, all they want is money. And if they get more money by collecting user data to target more people to buy Apple products, they will do that.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

All they want is data because that is their model for how they make money. Android may not be outright owned by Google but it's development and funding without Google would be on a very different level. Yeah it is open source to an extent but the versions out by Google have their changes made, which goes across the vast majority of android devices.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm in the same boat, but it seems to be some things they're going to change in 2024. Namely, sideloading apps, actual Firefox with add-ons, and the ability to actually move app icons wherever I want on the home screen (not sure if that'll change ever).

They've already gone to USB-C, which was the main reason I never would have switched over.

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Even with all those changes I wouldn't change.

[–] poshKibosh@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Sideloading’s possible and surprisingly easy on iOS even for non-technical folks, I use AltStore but I thinks there’s other options. Don’t know what I’d without uYou+ or TikTok LRD

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Funny that you mention it, a few months ago when updating stuff I got a new feature on my Android phone... Offline subtitle generation based on audio, just realtime generated from anything outputing sound on my phone.

A Google search suggests this might be an older feature - not sure if my phone didn't support it, or if I maybe just missed it, or if they added a more obvious button.

Google has a separate app for that stuff, called Private Compute Services. Right now it's nothing like an offline Google assistant replacement, but I thought it's really nice to have that stuff available without relying on internet access.

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Did you try to turn off the internet to see if it actually works? That's pretty amazing thank you for sharing!