this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
722 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3241 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Young voters overwhelmingly say they would support President Biden over former President Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up if the 2024 presidential election were held today, according to a poll released Wednesday.

In the Economist/YouGov poll — conducted via web-based interviews Dec. 16-18 — more than half (53 percent) of registered voters under 30 said they would support Biden, and less than a quarter (24 percent) said they would support Trump.

Another 10 percent said they would support another candidate, 4 percent said they were not sure, and 9 percent said they wouldn’t vote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 39 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Wait, just yesterday young voters didn’t like Biden? I’m beginning to think that maybe the news is all made up 🤪

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Liking Biden and voting for Biden can be two separate things.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

This is very true

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Still true, no one likes Biden. The alternative just happens to be an evil dictator.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

It's a fallacy of polling. They only had two choices here. The correct interpretation is they prefer him over Trump, but do not like him.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

If we had ranked ballot this would be my vote:

  1. John Stewart
  2. A tree stump
  3. Biden
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don’t like Biden much either, but a tree stump is just unkind. We needed Bernie Sanders, not another TV celebrity. (I do love me some John though)

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Love John, but he won't do it. He's said in multiple interviews that his place is outside the establishment generating the public will to act, which he couldn't do as a politician. I don't blame him. He seems to be more effective at getting change done than most senators or even presidents.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If Biden were to drop out there's a long list of people who really don't have the clout to galvanize a winning coalition on such short notice. The list of people who do and could win is one person long:

  1. John Stewart
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Stephen Colbert might be on that list too. And honestly, Harris would probably work for the same reasons as Biden.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Wait.. Tree Stump is running?

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not made up. Just a large population.

I could write an article about how Biden is really a cat and find people on the street to provide quotes for it.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying it's not literally made up, but effectively made up?

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Unless it’s literary, then it’s both?

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I read an article earlier this week that actually explains this. They had a result that young people preferred Trump to Biden -- but when they narrowed in on likely voters, it flipped to Biden. They noted that the individuals who preferred Trump tended to not vote in 2020.

Make of this what you will. I'm not entirely sure myself how to interpret this.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which is funny, because I read almost the opposite. These people are just making everything up.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Pft of course haha

Polling companies need to figure out a new strategy. Their current methodology isn't working. For a poll to be accurate it needs to be a simple random sample. It's tricky to do, but clearly what we have now is insufficient.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's a difference between voting for him and liking him. He's an awful person but the alternative is Trump, so there's not even as choice there

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Biden is not an awful person. He is a person who has spent a lifetime in politics and high office and has a long record to pick away at. People tend to forget that politics is the art of the possible. People who never compromise are radicals, like the Tea Party people, for example. It makes no sense to bitch about the radicals on the right and then denigrate the centrist. If you have specific criticisms, fine that's fair, but just summing Biden up as "an awful person" is both unwarranted and naive about the nature of politics.