this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
631 points (92.6% liked)

Political Memes

5414 readers
4528 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You could argue most of the money some top athletes make is from advertising deals and you might see that as amoral. Being really good at running is impressive, but doesn't inherently contribute hundreds of millions of dollars worth of value to society.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Brand deals with companies that sell stuff that's probably made by slave Labor. Not so ethical.

[–] Sprokes@jlai.lu 7 points 10 months ago

And don't forget taxes reduction schemes.

[–] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Is anything that any of us do in the western world ethical based on that though?

I mean who are to judge athletes for those brands deals when we're buying those products, using those phones/computers to go on Lemmy etc.

I'd argue musicians/athletes that do this are not the most ethical, but it's not this stuff that makes them the worst offenders.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

They are famous people, if they advertised a more ethical brand, people would buy that brand instead.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Consumption in the modern world has inherent problems, yes. The ethical way to exist in a world that values consumption as much as ours does is to consume less. You still HAVE to consume. There's a lot of stuff we either flat out need(food, water, shelter) or would be at SUCH a disadvantage without it becomes required (Internet, phone, car).

How you consume is important though. Use your phone until it's a brick. Buy local, and cook your own food. Vet whatever you buy as much as you can.

Entertainers feed into this lifestyle. They become the thing to consume. And that's OK in moderation, but not to the level that they become worth hundreds of millions, billions of dollars. That's excessive.