this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
381 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

60284 readers
5728 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Very weird turn of events given that Toyota has a history of being anti-EVs.

[–] zurohki@lemmy.fmhy.ml 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Their announcements about products that are way better than anything that actually exists with no solid plans to actually bring it to market is actually just another flavor of anti-EV FUD.

It's not the right time to buy an EV because our imaginary product is SO much better than any of those boring products, you should wait for it and keep buying our gas vehicles for now.

[–] barrio_libre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s depressing how cynical that is.

[–] Lukecis@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's depressing because its probably true and even if Toyota did create such a miracle tech, it would be insanely expensive to produce and thus purchase for the consumer. Not to mention with such an insane charge rate it would most likely never reach it due to the charge stations not supporting it and power infrastructure being unable to cope with such a load.

[–] barrio_libre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was referring to Toyota’s strategy being cynical, not the comment.

[–] Lukecis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Oh, Toyota's strategy isnt Cynical, its a deliberate choice by the higher ups to champion hybrid, hydrogen and refuse to join in the EV party- its not some cynical idea that ev's aren't here to stay or wont take off.

[–] pizza_rolls@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They were pro hydrogen but I think they realized that ship has sailed and EVs are here to stay for now

[–] zurohki@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think they were pro-hydrogen, and now they're using hydrogen as an excuse not to do battery EVs.

People who have heard of hydrogen cars but haven't looked at how inefficient and expensive they are still think that they're the future.

[–] Lukecis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I swear every other week I see a new video claiming Hydrogen cars are the future, despite our current tech just being inadequate to give them enough range, and how unsafe they are- ontop of how 95% of the world has next to 0 infrastructure to fuel said hydrogen fuel cars.

That's not to mention the costly & environmentally unfriendly production of hydrogen in the first place which at current production rates could never even if multiplied by multiple degrees- fully support a hydrogen majority of cars on the road.

Hydrogen Cars, the uncleanest, most unpractical and expensive "clean energy!" alternative fuel...

[–] zurohki@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most of hydrogen's problems are solvable - we can pack a car with hydrogen tanks, make hydrogen with electrolysis, build infrastructure, etc.

The big killer is price. Those hydrogen filling stations aren't $1000 each like home chargers or $50,000 each like DC fast chargers, they're something like 2 million dollars each. And you need them everywhere, there's no home filling to carry most of your usage.

The hydrogen you put in them? You have to pay for not just the electricity that makes it into your car's electric motor, but all the energy that was wasted along the way:

Nobody's looking to spend all that money on filling stations, and nobody's interested in paying 2-3x as much to fill their car.

[–] Someology@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, money is usually the answer.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago

So incorrect. Look at any major truck company (Volvo, Hyundai, Cummins, etc) and where the investments are. Grey hydrogen stations are getting funding all over, here's one in my extremely conservative and shit province https://www.src.sk.ca/news/sask-going-blue-hydrogen-hub-will-promote-further-investment-province. If you ignore all the investments and growth in the sector then sure, it's never gonna happen.

[–] 8ender@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Toyota has historically been pretty conservative on tech changes. They were one of the last to move away from carburetors for example

[–] md28@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Hmm, they were one of the first to mass produce hybrids, and the one of the first to try hydrogen. They must just have executives that really don't like the idea of filling up slowly.