482
Starlink loses out on $886 million in rural broadband subsidies
(www.theverge.com)
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Yes that's exactly my point
Okay but...they don't.
Starlink also covers the entire planet and all the oceans, which is simply not feasible with wires.
And also simply not necessary to have as many satellites as Starlink does needed to cover the ocean and the rare spots where wires can't go.
And we really need that 4K UHD porn to load faster on the hole planet, including the oceans.
You're intentionally conflating high speed internet access with any internet access at all.