this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
524 points (87.2% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3815 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Let me preface by saying that I myself am not making a political statement, just a quick retort/correction:

"...Seems they [biologists] have achieved something like a consensus on the matter [trans women are women]. I don't see anything inherently political"

No, that's not a scientific question or statement, it's a sociological one, which makes it intrinsically political.

We, as a society, or a large enough group, can come up with a consensus belief that trans rights are human rights and that we can collectively treat other people by the gender role of their choice.

But biologically speaking, being trans doesn't change one's chromosomes. Which is why I think it's misguided to say that trans issues are actually questions that hard science should answer, they aren't.

Which, ironically, is why Elon's moronic AI gambit is failing (by his metrics), because the online culture he used to as a dataset to train it, has collectively agreed that trans women are women, amongst other social and political opinions that his sycophants can't stand.

He probably should have trained it with TruthSocial's cesspool instead.

I can't wait to see Tay AI 2.0 level reincarnation after they "retrain it". It's going be to hilarious.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago

I mean, science is a framework that can be applied to anything. Sociology included. So we can't currently measure a genetic cause for trans. I guess that means our current best measurement is what gender people associate with, what they personally feel is right. That also happens to be the best path towards not being a dick to people who feel like their gender does not match their "biological" gender.

If and when we can improve our measurements of this maybe we'll learn something new. Maybe we can learn what components of nature and nurture lead to gender disphoria. Then we can try to further improve quality of life for affected folks.

[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

Fun fact, chromosomes aren't the whole story when it comes to the way a person's body develops and isn't a useful measure of what someone's gender is in any form. There are plenty of women that aren't trans with xy chromosomes and vice versa with men. See swyer and de la Chapelle syndromes for more information. There are all sorts of combinations of chromosomes someone can have and we aren't anywhere limited to just xx or xy.