this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
3595 points (98.4% liked)

Fediverse

28395 readers
317 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy.ml has now blocked Threads.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If one instance gets too big they could just ignore the standard and start adding random tweaks to it. And all the others would eventually have to adapt to that or risk becoming irrelevant by being incompatible with the big instance.

[โ€“] HopperMCS@twisti.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Federation allows for choice. Indeed, many AP implementations already add to the base AP stuff. Peertube already does this itself.

For this to really be a problem, the server software would need to be maintained by the same person running the instance, and they have to have the manpower already to either a) Build an implementation or b) Run a fork of existing software. Both take effort and quite frankly is juice that isn't worth the squeeze to risk cutting yourself off from the network like that.