this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
530 points (87.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43892 readers
781 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

12 year olds voting, Jesus Christ

[โ€“] Xariphon@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What are you afraid they'll do?

What are you afraid they'll do that old people don't already do?

[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lack understanding and life experiences

[โ€“] Xariphon@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which would end in...?

You go in the booth, it's Option A or Option B. You fill in the box. Nobody cares why.

What you've said here is a meaningless non-answer based on culturally ingrained prejudice.

In reality, we already don't require old people to actually have or demonstrate either of those things.

Sheltered people and hermits aren't denied the vote. They don't have to have experienced anything but the passage of time, regardless of how little they've filled it with.

People who watch lies on purpose aren't denied the vote. They might have no understanding but misunderstanding and still are able to steer the course of the country based on delusions and propaganda.

Think of every garbage politician you've seen get elected. All the damage they've done. And realize that old people elected every single one of them.

[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which would end in...?

Even dumber shit than we now have

[โ€“] Xariphon@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At this point I have to conclude you're not ready to address this conversation in good faith.

[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You are arguing for 12-yo voters.

[โ€“] Xariphon@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At least you followed that far.

[โ€“] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why not? Have you talked to a twelve year old recently?

[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have and that's exactly why. I have also been one.

[โ€“] themeatbridge@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter. Is a 12 year old actually worse in any way?

[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Because they're like the average person, but even worse since they don't have the life experience and understanding older people have.

We are talking about 12-yo people ffs. Even compared to average adult they're totally retarded.

[โ€“] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I know 12 year olds that are working part time to help raise siblings, and I know 30 year olds that have never left their hometown or read a book that wasn't required in school. Old people with lots of life experience don't understand data privacy and think climate science is a fad. Young people have a unique perspective on issues like education, social security, and economic investment in the future. Why is that life experience less valid at 12 than at 18? Why is life experience necessary at all?

Why does intelligence factor into your objection? We don't ask adults to pass a test, nor should we. While I object to you using "retarded" to call children stupid, your slur undercuts your own argument. Adults with intellectual disabilities are able to vote without any obstacles or tests. The average 12 year old is perfectly capable of understanding complex topics and making informed decisions. They may not make the decisions we would like them to make, and they may regret their decisions, but again how is that different from any adult?

[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Calling 12-yo's takes "unique" is certainly one way to phrase it.

Why is that life experience less valid at 12 than at 18? Why is life experience necessary at all?

Because you have to set the bar somewhere.

The average 12 year old is perfectly capable of understanding complex topics and making informed decisions.

Have you actually met any 12-year-olds? Their understanding of stuff is retarded.

[โ€“] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm happy to debate this with you, but that's the second time you've used a slur disparaging people with disabilites. Hope your day is as pleasant as you are.

[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What, do you mean retard? Does it mean something other than mentally retarded or what's the issue

[โ€“] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is an outdated term for intellectually disabled, and using it when you mean "stupid" is offensive. Intellectual disability is not the same as intelligence. Calling someone disabled as an insult is offensive. People with disabilities are not lesser than you, and it is the height of arrogance to look down upon people who overcome adversity to educate themselves while simultaneously being objectively wrong and demonstrably ignorant on the subject.

[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Intellectual disability (ID), also known as general learning disability in the United Kingdom[3] and formerly mental retardation,[4][5] is a generalized neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by significantly impaired intellectual and adaptive functioning. It is defined by an IQ under 70, in addition to deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors that affect everyday, general living.

I'm saying they are intellectually deficit compared even to the average adult. Would you be happier if I called them illectually disabled? Dunno what that even changes.

[โ€“] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, because they aren't intellectually disabled, and calling someone intellectually disabled should not be something you say to insult people. The only difference is that you're not using a slur to do it.

[โ€“] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

They're not mentally retarded, they're just on the same level intellectually