this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
432 points (97.8% liked)

RetroGaming

19555 readers
228 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been determined to finally beat Zelda II and determine that I would do it without save states and without a guide.

I know Zelda II is considered a black sheep somewhat but I really think in some ways it’s more fun than the original although I’d still pick Zelda 1 over II.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There was a lot of that in that era. Arcade games had financial incentive to be hard as players would tolerate to eat as many quarters as possible. The home ports carried this difficulty over, and many console originals picked up on it. (See Battletoads.)

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Battle toads can eat a schlong. Actually good games like kid icarus, etc were just as hard but actually fun to play.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

For the home market, there was an incentive to make the game hard to beat before you had to return it to Blockbuster.