this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
787 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3520 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign, a sign of the president’s strength in uniting his party to have the backing of one of its most liberal members

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes, this is why we must unequivocally support the guy who couldn't get any laws passed to protect against said RW fascist insurgency. The guy who can't get his own party to pass voting rights expansion. The guy with no plan to counter the hijacked Supreme Court, and who has steadfastly refused to develop one. Yup, this is the guy that'll stop American Fascism.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Always blaming everyone except for the actual fascists is exactly where the fascists want you.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No one's blaming biden for the facists existence but are you expecting the facists to stop themselves? If not someones gotta do it, like maybe the commander in chief of the country under attack.

[–] alphalyrae@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

And exactly how would Biden get anything through a Senate currently spilt between the two parties? You would need 60 votes to overcome the constant filibusters the Rs would throw up since this would not be a budgetary vote.

Last time I checked, there are only 48 Dems plus three independents who caucus with the Dems, for a total of 51. We'd need at least 62 to account for Sinema and Manchin, so expecting Biden to solve this is delusional.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Don't dwell on the past. Plan ahead. Vote. Give him the tools. This is a global emergency.

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What tools does he need and how do I give them to him

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A country with no elected R politicians at any level or as close to that as possible. VOTE

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

The Democrats had control of both the White House and Congress, and they still didn't codify Roe v. Wade into law.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

What makes you think he'll use those tools when he won't use the ones he already has? This is like when the police say they need more resources in order to tackle police brutality.

[–] sarin_sunshine@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

It's so easy to keep the status quo going when you're able to convince both sides that it'll be the literal end of the world if the other side wins. Keep voting for one of the two parties which are chosen for you, it'll turn out alright.

[–] sarin_sunshine@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

It's so easy to keep the status quo going when you're able to convince both sides that it'll be the literal end of the world if the other side wins. Keep voting for one of the two parties which are chosen for you, it'll turn out alright.

[–] Leer10@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

bro we gave him the presidency and congress for two years

[–] el_cordoba@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Manchin, Sinema, and fillabusters prevented any real change during those two years. IIRC Biden and congressional democrats were able to use budget reconcillation rules to get past the 60 vote rule to get stuff done, after they placated Manchin and Sinema though.

[–] alphalyrae@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

This is correct. They had to shove a ton of initiatives into the reconcilation to get anything done with Sinema and Manchin blocking everything.

[–] sarin_sunshine@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

It's so easy to keep the status quo going when you're able to convince both sides that it'll be the literal end of the world if the other side wins. Keep voting for one of the two parties which are chosen for you, it'll turn out alright.

[–] acunasdaddy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The filibuster exists. Biden isn’t all powerful. None of the things you mentioned would get past the current congress.

Biden isn’t perfect. But trump is the end of America. Vote Biden 24

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it were reversed, Trump would be bullying the GOP senators in his way (and he might even pull a couple of Democrat votes because they lack party unity)

[–] acunasdaddy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Trump isn’t bullying his way past 60 senators and the house for anything major. They passed one major piece of legislation (tax cuts) when he was in office. That’s it. No Obamacare repeal, no abortion legislation, nothing of significance. And now they don’t have any platform anyway so….

[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The choice is between guy we don't like and aren't that excited about, and literal fascists. If you have a viable, shot in hell alternative, glad to hear. If not, you're doing the work of the fascists.