this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
180 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15914 readers
12 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Idk it's vague, just says this:
Implied 50 entire countries to me but idk
I don't think there are 30+ whole countries with specific states/province laws on gender self ID. All the lists on self ID I'm seeing only include the US, Canada, Australia, and Mexico for that. And there's only 25 federations in the world, afaik it's pretty hard for unitary states to have subdivisional laws like that
I took "insufficiently robust processes for recognising gender" as more than just self-ID. But maybe "50 countries and US states" just means "50 jurisdictions, including 20 whole countries and 30 individual states/provinces," Daily Mail is bound to suck at phrasing