this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
398 points (74.8% liked)

Political Memes

5431 readers
3131 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

But…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Thinking the color of your skin has anything to do with anything is an easy way for me to not take anything you say seriously. The inequality is class based, not race. But keep spouting off about how whiteys are the devil and creating more racists of all colors. Both of these sides serve the ruling class by distracting us from the real issues.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So, what's your race and gender then as I'm generally curious.

[–] TransSynthesist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

It's got to be intentional irony, right?

[–] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's mostly white people. I'm white. I know these people. I've been this person. Yes I agree, there is a meta inequality based on class outside of race. Just like there is "colourism" within non-white communities. These are all valid struggles that are worth fighting, and don't detract from other battles. They're in fact necessary skirmishes in a larger war (for universal human dignity, flourishing, whatever you want to call it).

Pardon all the violent analogies. The people at my work have infected me with this way of speaking.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

“colourism”

the word you're looking for is racism.

[–] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're right in that it is racism as well, and rooted in it. Though it is different in kind, and anyone who hasn't experienced it personally should be careful not to redefine it out of existence. So just like all robbery is theft, being robbed is an instance of theft that can feel very different from other kinds of theft.

Actually I'll just let Alice Walker do the talking:

Colorism, [...] “prejudicial or preferential treatment of same-race people based solely on their color.” It is not racism although there is a clear relationship.

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Imagine if a white person would need to choose between a black candidate and a white candidate for a job, and they choose the white candidate saying "well obviously I'm going to choose someone my own race" - what kind of mental gymnastics are you or Alice there gonna do to explain how that's colorism, not racism?

[–] Deuces@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

That is racism. Colorism is far more common in Asia than in the west. When two Han Chinese people apply for the job and they hire the lighter skinned person you can't call it racist as they are literally both the same race. So it instead falls under colorism. In the end of the day, as long as you recognize that both are bad it doesn't really matter what you call it, except that it makes it easier to communicate with others.

[–] quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would agree with that, but the meme is essentially implying that white people's opinions don't matter.
This is the exact type of stuff that fuels more racism on the right.
How do you expect to fix inequality by treating people unequally.

[–] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

implying that white people’s opinions don’t matter

I'm a white person and I definitely did not read that into it. What it literally says is that if you play devil's advocate for your own amusement, on topics that you don't have any stake in, without any intention of learning, then you're behaving insincerely. And that's bad.

[–] quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 11 months ago

If you remove race from the meme and your last comment, we are in complete agreement.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.de -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The inequality is class based, not race.

Can you provide sources to back that up? (Genuine question, idk what science currently got to say about this.)

[–] quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's hard to do because it's a very broad statement. What I would need to send depends on which parts of your beliefsystem are incomplete or incorrect. Or i'd be writing a two hour essay combining facts and conclusions. I'll try to keep it short.

You can easily conjure up statistics to back the claim that black people generally are poorer, and this does have a race-based history. However, underneath that is the class inequality, which because of the historic race inequality, means a lot of people of color being in the lower class.

At this point in time, inequality between the ultrarich and poor (of all colors) is broadening faster than ever. People looking for someone to blame. Media directs them in one of two directions, both incorrect.
a) The problem is migrants and communists who want to destroy tradition because they want free money.
b) The problem is racists and bigots who just love to hate for the sake of it.
These two factions are set up against eachother, reinforcing the need for the other's existence.
Now that's not to say both sides are equally incorrect, don't get me wrong. But for the most part, neither of them acknowledge the issue of corruption in government allowing things like lobbying and gerrymandering which essentially provides a way for cooperations and money interests to have bought and paid for politicians on both sides. Since the system is inherently set up for money to have different objectives than commoners, we get eaten.

This is the underlying issue causing race issues in the first place. Tribalism is exploited by these people because commoners want answers they're not getting. It happens on both sides and it does not address the underlying issue.

Yes, racism exists, and it should be addressed. But you cannot fight racism with more racism. You attack the problem at it's root instead.