this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
686 points (100.0% liked)

196

16490 readers
2380 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 112 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Warren v. DC: "Police have no obligation to protect people."

Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales: "Police have no obligation to enforce the law."

Heien v. North Carolina: "Police have no obligation to know the law."

[–] Mutelogic@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 year ago

I didn't believe you, so I looked up those cases. While there's a little more nuance to the cases than your summaries, you are pretty spot on. We are all cursed with this disgraceful knowledge now.

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a bizarro version of the three monkeys.

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago

Protect no people, enforce no laws, know no laws?

[–] OreoCat@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

so they're basically useless to us

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

They have no legal obligation to be useful, let's put it that way.

There are cops and departments which take an active and sincere interest in community policing and social justice.... but power tends to corrupt, and the almost complete lack of obligation or oversight combined with the weird hero-worship of the right-wing means most cops and departments are not interested in anything except the perpetuation of their own power.

[–] Kalkaline@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

But not to the rich