this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
460 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2800 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I am a physicist and truly appreciate the effect of quantum computing on our simulations, but with "real world" I meant proper industrial use. And for that, there are hardly any algorithms known except Shor's. When the CEO of Deutsche Bank says he will do his bank transactions on a quantum computer, you know the topic is over-hyped.

Edit: A video that explains this by a theoretical physicist working on the foundations of quantum mechanics

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago

You're still wrong. Quantum computers have use for developing new medications through simulating chemical interactions, and in making logistics more efficient. The hit against encryption is vastly overrated, and may not even be feasible.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I understand that you can't just translate random algorithms to quantum computers and expect them to run better - but I did link an overview of 5 quantum algorithms that have real world uses, and Shor's is only one of them.

I don't consider Sabine Hossenfelder a person worth listening to. She frequently comments on topics she doesn't know much about/has a very biased view of (e.g. her transphobic video).

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, Hossenfelder has had a bad habit of stepping outside of her lane. From what I've heard from physicists, she's questionable even inside her lane.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

She might have strong opinions on particle physics and I do take them with a grain of salt, but I don't see objectively wrong things in there.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Given that you thought that factoring primes was the only real world application of QC, I frankly don't take your opinion here very seriously. Breaking encryption is one of the least interesting applications of QC. It's just the one that gets all the headlines. Yes, even for "proper industrial use".

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks for this productive discourse, not ad hominem at all. You're welcome to criticize my views and I'm happy to learn. And I am doing my physics masters, so I think I am no complete idiot. But this is also not productive.

Edit: I'm focusing on cosmology, I'm not claiming to be a quantum computing expert. That was just my last state of knowledge and I'm always happy to learn.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Focusing on what QC will do to encryption tends to mean you got most of your knowledge about them from pop sci articles. As you can see from this very thread, you're hardly alone in this, but it remains a big red flag for people who don't know what they're talking about on this subject.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I just mixed up the fact that proper industrial use is vastly overestimated/overhyped with that there is little use. I will do some research.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

The pharmaceutical use alone would be revolutionary. There's a whole other discussion about how the pharmaceutical industry will continue to overcharge for drugs, but that's separate from the technology itself.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are you talking about her video on trans athletes? I don't remember it being transphobic.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm talking about her video on transitions in general, not sure if you're referring to that or something else. She misrepresented the state of research (implying there's less research concluding transitions to be a good thing than there really is) and shared misinformation.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think I was talking about this, interesting. Because in the video I mentioned she was fine with trans athletes competing together with cis athletes, which seemed very progressive to me. But I'm happy to be proven wrong.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I was talking about "Is being trans a social fad among teenagers?".