this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
19 points (88.0% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
1044 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] virr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There have been ways to recycle organic waste into oil for decades. They even built a full sized plant to use turkey offal from a nearby turkey processor (initially could get it for free). Even ran demos on tire rubber or plastics. Initially cost effective when oil prices were high as they could sell the oil.

Few of problems. Up front cost is high. Oil price volotility and the drop in oil prices made it uneconomic. Coupled with needing to pay for the turkey offal (someone else started paying the processor for it), killed the plant being fully self funded.

Since then refinements in the process, or closely related ones, keep being developed without being able to overcome the economics. These processes can recycle from just about anything organic, including plastics, to whatever oil feedstock you want. Plastic as good as virgin plastics, pharmaceuticals, or whatever oil you want. Still the economics don't work when oil is cheap and new oils societal costs are externalized.

[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. The issue has never been actually doing it, because chemistry is chemistry and all chemical bonds can be broken- it's the economic viability, because breaking chemical bonds in hydrocarbon polymers is incredibly energy intensive. Energy that, up until now, would have also been coming from petroleum or fossil fuels, so you'd end up with a net negative. Thermodynamics hates an engineer's guts and makes his life hard.

However those economics might certainly be changing as oil supplies gradually tighten and extremely cheap peak solar electricity becomes much more plentiful. Once midday electricity becomes an almost waste and the energy is cheap, the economics of processing becomes a lot more attractive.

[–] virr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is a good point on energy costs. Cheap solar energy is going to change the dynamics to a lot of things.