this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
260 points (97.4% liked)

Firefox

18146 readers
30 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It seems pretty obvious why they are doing all this, why they dont remove it from chrome store?

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They probably don't want all those people realizing they can install extensions manually, because then they'd need to actively scan for and block extension installations.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or realizing they can stick to an older Chrome version with V2 extensions that retain full capabilities...

[–] bluefirex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That will stop working way sooner than you'd like. Freezing a browser isn't tenable at all, not just for features websites are expecting but also security issues. There's a reason every browser except Safari has a 6 weeks release cycle.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Web tech doesn't evolve that fast. You can use a 1 year old version today without worrying about missing any website functionality.

What you're missing is features that the browser itself introduces, but in this case those would be anti-features so arguably Chrome will be getting worse.

Then there's of course the security vulnerabilities.

Of course the whole discussion is moot since there's a much simpler alternative, switching to another browser.

[–] Juno@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago
[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They're boiling the frog.